IJ & MD
- Apr 18, 2016

***The ONLY thing that counts

Many may think we exist to provide information on interesting or controversial archaeological finds. However, that is only a sideline to what we do. We have one main purpose - to provide evidence of a race of 'tall ones' that both Maori and Archaeologists say do not exist as a race (for if they did they would predate Maori). Maori have legends of tall warriors and it could be those legends are based on having one of these last tall ones in their ranks for a short time? As to exposing a race of tall people, many of Maori descent are with us and fully supportive. Many ex-professionals are also ready to backup what they have seen in years past that is now hushed up...but without conclusive evidence, who would believe any of these people - right? We need proof of something many say does not exist so as to open up the facts of a nationwide cover-up (if in fact it exists). Only one thing will convince me a cover-up exists - finding skeletons of excessive height that many say do not exist. Proof. Undeniable evidence. Something tangible that should not be possible.

There have been many stories of discoveries that supposedly pre-date Maori where we have been told have been hushed up, destroyed or covered over. I'm both a skeptic and a believer if you can imagine that. I take the position of the receiver i.e "I sort of believe you, but prove it to me anyway". The only way to prove these rumours is by one manner and one manner only - providing evidence of tall skeletons. I say tall skeletons because small ones (Turehu) could be classified as children by Archaeologists, and rock walls and lines on rocks, or lines of rocks, could be just that to the skeptic and the general public. And it's the general public we need to convince to gain a ground swell.

If you have followed us long enough you will know we are investigating three sites rumoured to hold tall skeletons. By tall we mean at least 7' and above. If these were found and evidenced correctly, publicly, and in various manners, then surely people will sit up and begin to ask questions? Surely the retired ones who know more than they have been saying will come forward and tell us stories museums have long suppressed? Why couldn't they have done it before now you ask? Because there was no proof elsewhere that would backup their stories, as the proof they saw is locked up in secure vaults and they cannot 'backup' their claims with 'evidence'. Therefore, we need physical undeniable proof to enable other people to come forward. The analogy is when someone is convicted of rape and then the other victims finally come forward only because now the guy is convicted, other victims will now have their story believed. It is the same type of circumstance here, excluding the rape analogy - or maybe not!

We have stated this earlier in January and repeat it to make it clear. If inside the first cavern there are just ordinary Maori bones of ordinary stature as I've found elsewhere already - that job ends. If the other two locations produce nothing that fits our primary task of skeletons above ordinary stature, then this website will shut down for there would be no point in continuing. We are not able to maintain an informational or archaeological discovery site with no end goal - no end purpose. Plenty of others are able to do that if they wish, but we all have jobs and need to make money to survive (unless there are any wealthy benefactors out there prepared to pay to have a group reveal the evidence?).

Therefore, our discovery is a boom or bust scenario.

By the end of next year, or slightly earlier, we will be able to confirm Site #1 as boom or bust. Three words.

Hang with us.