172: Revealing hidden history is dangerous
If you regard an 8’ human being as a giant (at 2.4 metres, that's ceiling height), then giants do not fit the theory of evolution that Darwin put forward. That evolution theory is now strangely accepted as fact, even though it is still only a theory. And even if on the surface of it (excluding any belief in a being from another dimension of space and time), it seems a good theory or alternative; even if there is scant evidence for it, and much of that is deliberately contrived and what there is remains so full of holes it defies intelligence... See the problem? Therefore, challenging the new 'belief' in an old theory, with a new 'fact', will likely result in us being the most hated people in the world in some quarters - even if we can prevent others from stopping us making the find both fully public and publicly accepted. And we can, but we won't reveal how.
Whether you accept it as true or not, the Torah does tell stories of giants. Many other religions also have the same stories. Celtic mythology, Greek and Roman mythology, Hindu mythology, Norse mythology, Shinto folklore etc - they all tell of ancient giants. But why did so many cultures, physically and time distant from each other, have these ancient stories? The answer may be obvious. They either saw them, or heard stories from those that did. Countless other cultures and legends also talk of giants. Much of ancient history has giants within their legends - as do Maori (Te Mata). Even the Native Americans have more recent stories of giants (2000-2500 years old) where they had to kill these giants occupying the land before they could claim it for themselves (think about that one for a moment - "they had to kill another previous inhabitant to claim their land!" - anyone see the irony in that?).
But they are all fables right? Are they? Well, it is true that none of those stories can be conclusively proved so therefore they are still regarded as fables. But just assume the Torah/Bible was ever proved right, or the supposed urban legends of Lovelock Cave and others was proved right - in regard to giants; that alone would be a situation many would most definitely not want confirmed. I know this is a weird angle to come from, but we are not trying to infer whether the Torah/Bible is correct or not - but to suggest that some people would really hate it to be... and vehemently so!
Evidence of a previously unknown race of ‘giants’, now extinguished, would change historical theory; and evolutionary theory more particularly. If someone could openly produce evidence of a family of exceedingly tall and perfectly healthy skeletons (free of genetic deformations as they were), then that actual evidence would counter evolutionary belief. And trust me - evidence is the only thing that will turn the thinking of some. And evidence (not suggestion), is all we are really interested in.
That alone makes what we do very dangerous; not just from certain people who would not want their race to be shifted from being first here - but also from evolutionary scientists who do not want their ‘faith' in a theory challenged. Unfortunately, finding these skeletons will cause many religious fruitcakes to surface as well. I am not referring to those who believe in God and the Bible, but to those ones who really are religious fruitcakes.
If what we seek are found at any of our other sites (for the original location was abandoned for being too dangerous), and if they are lying as reported, and if we manage to record everything, and if we release all that along with CD and DNA reports, and if the find is both acknowledged (and eventually protected by law) - not only does known history change, but it will challenge many well entrenched belief systems as well.
Our primary goal is to reveal the physical evidence we know to exist, as many recent reports have come to us of large skeletons being found and whisked away. And these aren't reports from 1880 or 1907, one we recently received is from 1955. The latest verified case is from 2008! But there is far more at stake than just revealing them. Some may only begin to see that now. We knew all along and it seems we are being watched by more than you might suspect. Some hope to find us to shut us down, many more offer support and information (including iwi) that they can't present themselves, but will wait until we produce the platform for them to do so, or give it to us to present to the world. And there is more - much more. There are probably a few worried people already, desperately hoping we do not succeed. Indeed some far-north iwi are resigned to the fact the truth will come out soon, which is odd as there are no reports of tall skeletons in the far north although we know of some very ancient ones with maukaki made up of human teeth... that is very old indeed and 'not one of us' we were told by local Maori.
And since we revealed a 'permineralized' human femur shaft bone in 2019, excavated from the fill of the first attempt, (and even that earth was brought in from another location in order to seal that entrance....), well, things seem to have hotted up considerably already with all the information flooding in... and if you only knew....!!!!!
