Sidestep: What's possible in human size?

There is a whole genre of posts where people claim that a giant skeleton has been found, as evidenced by a picture of a tiny person photoshopped in or next to a massive pile of bones. Posts dating back several years are often accompanied by claims that a recent excavation in India has uncovered a giant 80-foot skeleton. While a depressing amount of people have accepted the proof (doctored photo), others have obviously been mocking the conspiracy theory... and rightly so. Reverse Google searches show many of these were made for a Worth1000 photoshop contest in 2002.

Giants... the big ones over 12' etc are not possible with normal skeletal structure because of the square-cube law, which states that as the size of any object grows (be it a cube or an accountant) its volume grows faster than its surface area. The area grows in proportion to the square of your size, whereas your volume scales up in proportion to the cube of your size. Say you are 18ft tall – 3 times the height of a 6-foot tall person – your body would have to support 30 times the volume.

Here are the facts....

A tall human could reach 9' without any noticeable density of bones. But all the claims of over 12' are a complete fabrication because the bone structure would be so different they would look like Mastodon bones... (small hint there). But 8'-9', yes they are not only plausible they are real. But 12'?... Mmmm, I'm not so sure. They'd be bigger, have enough mass to make them slower that a 6' warrior could run rings around them if they could stay out of his reach and swing - and if you've seen LOTR and the troll in mountain you'll know what I mean. Big and powerful - but clumsy too. No wonder the native American’s say they defeated these giant people (around 9') and took their lands over (whoa, say what? Yes! The Native American legends say they did exactly what the 'white people' did to them - but that’s a another story!)

These 'giant' giant stories (12' plus) just add to the disbelief of the possibility tall races once existed. After all, we've already proved they can and did. And if they did, at 8'-9' no atheist scientist would ever admit it would they? So yes, scientific cover-ups are entirely possible to protect the evolutionary teaching - even if animals being gigantic and then getting smaller fits the scientific record.

We still have the only modern photograph of a professionally verified bone from someone close to 8' tall. It's not enough evidence because the femoral ends were missing (cannibal feast just as the location names near where it was found suggest). The only proof the public (and ourselves) will accept is a picture of a skull, or a full femur (if not the whole skeleton) alongside measuring equipment. You will likely not see anything on our site here nor any site with any conclusive photographic and video proof, from multiple angles, until suddenly every msm site and every social media platform has those images all at the same time. That way you can't shut it down quickly.

On the other hand, if we just decided to stop you'd be none the wiser anyway.